HR isn't evil - by Rob Lambert
View this email in your browser
A Cultivated Life Newsletter
Hi,
I hope you are safe and well. Sorry for the lack of newsletters this last couple of weeks. Life has been busy, and I’ve been sorting out a new direction for myself and my work. Back on it.
In my line of consulting, I get brought into companies that have problems with delivery. As such, I get to work with leaders and managers to help drive through growth and unblock delivery.
A place I often start looking is the role of HR and Management. And who does what.
HR isn’t evil.
I often hear managers and employees say that HR are “evil” – they don’t mean it literally, but as a descriptor that encompasses many beliefs formed when working with HR.
In fact, when I was a VP in HR someone told me that our HR team was now “less evil” – a compliment, I think.
But why do people think HR are evil?
Because HR:
Instigate rules and procedures and nudge everyone to follow them – but these rules, policies and procedures are often designed to ensure the company doesn’t break the law.
They often “stop” the over-the-top, wild joy at events, parties, and social activities – when the reality is many of these “stops” are simply designed to avoid breaking laws (think health and safety, decency, equality etc).
They are often described as “transactional” – when the reality is HR are often overwhelmed with requests and workload – often about stuff that frankly, people could sort for themselves.
They are often cited as not adding value or being aligned to what the company is doing – when the reality is many executives don’t include HR in strategic decisions, seeing them as a supporting role rather than a strategic partner.
They are often cited as siding with the business when it comes to performance or disciplinary action – this is to be expected - they work for the business.
And here’s the crux of why HR are sometimes described as evil – they work for the business.
Their primary goal is to prevent the business being sued, or in breach of laws. They exist to protect the business.
And the interesting thing here is that we all work for the business to achieve these goals and more, so why the drama?
The HR world has rebranded in recent years to various names such as “People” (not bad), “Talent Management” (really?) and “Employee Development” (hmm). This shows how HR are trying to move away from merely legal, transactional, recruitment type work to more personnel development.
This is a good move, but it doesn’t hide the fact that HR exist to support the business and stop the business getting into trouble. The more we can understand HR goals and objectives, the more we can appreciate why things are often the way they are.
However, certainly in recent years, HR have started to move SO far into the “people” world that they are causing new problems. I can see why.
When I was studying for a Diploma in HR, the course material very much paints a picture that HR are the owners of personnel development, recruitment, retention, and the like. I couldn’t disagree more.
That’s a manager’s job supported by HR.
HR cannot possibly know your people as well as you do as a manager (unless it’s a small business).
Who knows the domain of work better? HR or you, the manager?
Who is studying and observing your team’s behaviours – you or HR?
In recent years I’ve seen HR over-rule managers regarding new hires. The manager has said “not in my team” to a potential candidate and HR have said “yes – they are perfect”. How dis-empowering is that? How terrible that must be for the new starter - already on the back foot with their new manager.
I’ve seen HR roll out learning management systems, full of courses, that don’t address specific needs. A “catch all” approach to learning that simply doesn’t change behaviours in the business.
I’ve seen HR decide and steer the delivery of work through an agile approach, without knowing anything at all about agile.
I’ve seen HR influence executives to make strategic and cultural business changes based on Employee Engagement scores, which they have started to use as leading business indicators. (Employee Engagement results are non-scientific, not comparable across industries and frankly only tell you what you already know - that managers are not always doing their job correctly).
This use of Engagement scores leads the business to put people’s “happiness and engagement” above delivering business results (and in one specific company I worked, that resulted in the business tanking quickly). Does achieving a high engagement score and poor business results count as a success? I don’t think so - balance must be sought.
HR have levers to pull that can bring about change, through great initiatives carefully designed to support the business. But there comes a point when engagement, retention and succession planning are the very essence of a manager’s role. Not HR.
HR are not evil, but when they take away the responsibilities from management, they certainly can screw things up.
HR exist to protect the business as their first goal - and then to provide brilliant initiatives and management training to bring about retention, engagement, and career development.
There are two sides to HR and knowing these is important for career growth, delivery and building better relationships with them.
HR will always side with what is right for the business - and it pays to know this. It puts you in a great position to embrace them, work with them and know how to align with them.
HR is essential. Management is too. And when they both work in harmony, you get an amazing place to work.
Until next week
Rob..
Interesting Links
Seth Godin is spot on here when he talks about expertise versus attitude and how most companies have given up trying to find the best. I've always hired for the softer skills, especially communication skills and the willingness to learn.
Asking a female employee to deal with "personal" feedback because women are better at this sort of thing, is discrimination. How could you have thought this wasn't the case!
Tips on how to avoid burnout.
How to maintain a strong "remote" work culture.
Supernotes looks like an interesting app for managing knowledge. I've just moved to Nimbus notes from Evernote and it's amazing.
Remote interview? Some question you SHOULD be asked. Apparently. Not sure I agree with all of them.
No salary in the job advert? People are less likely to apply. I know I wouldn't - especially when many companies, to Seth's post above, have no idea what they're trying to buy and have given up - hence the salary rarely matches the responsibilities and expectations.
Ta.
Rob
A labour of love
This newsletter is a labour of love. If you enjoyed this newsletter, then please consider supporting me:
This newsletter is better with friends - share the love by sharing this newsletter. Subscribe page is here.
Subscribe to my YouTube channel for weekly insights
Consider sitting my Communication Super Power Workshop
Maybe you'd like to buy a book?
Thanks
Rob..